<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1966 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773853</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi-AT dismissed the appeal of sub-contractors challenging service tax liability. The tribunal held that sub-contractors remain liable to pay service tax even when main contractors have discharged their tax obligations, rejecting the applicability of Board Circular No. 96/7/2007-ST. Following the larger bench decision in Commissioner of Service Tax vs. Melange Developers Pvt Ltd, the tribunal clarified that post-July 2012, sub-contractors are exempt only if main contractors&#039; services are exempt. Since residential complex construction was not exempt, both sub-contractors were liable for service tax on services provided to the main contractor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:43:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1966 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773853</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi-AT dismissed the appeal of sub-contractors challenging service tax liability. The tribunal held that sub-contractors remain liable to pay service tax even when main contractors have discharged their tax obligations, rejecting the applicability of Board Circular No. 96/7/2007-ST. Following the larger bench decision in Commissioner of Service Tax vs. Melange Developers Pvt Ltd, the tribunal clarified that post-July 2012, sub-contractors are exempt only if main contractors&#039; services are exempt. Since residential complex construction was not exempt, both sub-contractors were liable for service tax on services provided to the main contractor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>