<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1973 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773860</link>
    <description>An approved resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code fixed the creditor&#039;s entitlement to the amount provided in the plan, and the electricity department could not revive pre-CIRP arrears or insist on payment beyond the settled dues. The corporate debtor&#039;s compliance with the plan operated as full and final settlement of the admitted claim, so the arrear demand was impermissible and was quashed. Reconnection of HT supply also could not be refused on the basis of those past dues, although the consumer remained bound to complete the other lawful formal, technical and infrastructural requirements for reconnection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:43:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1973 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773860</link>
      <description>An approved resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code fixed the creditor&#039;s entitlement to the amount provided in the plan, and the electricity department could not revive pre-CIRP arrears or insist on payment beyond the settled dues. The corporate debtor&#039;s compliance with the plan operated as full and final settlement of the admitted claim, so the arrear demand was impermissible and was quashed. Reconnection of HT supply also could not be refused on the basis of those past dues, although the consumer remained bound to complete the other lawful formal, technical and infrastructural requirements for reconnection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>