<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1976 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773863</link>
    <description>Imported relay-based products were held classifiable under CTH 8537, because technical literature, catalogues and expert opinion showed they operated as integrated multifunctional systems performing protection, control, monitoring, metering, communication and programmable logic functions, rather than as simple relays under CTH 8536 49 00. The exemption in Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. was unavailable because it was confined to relays with contact rating up to 7 amperes and the goods were not simpliciter relays. For the GE India matter, prior departmental awareness and an earlier classification decision on similar goods meant the extended limitation period was not satisfied, so the demand was time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:43:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1976 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773863</link>
      <description>Imported relay-based products were held classifiable under CTH 8537, because technical literature, catalogues and expert opinion showed they operated as integrated multifunctional systems performing protection, control, monitoring, metering, communication and programmable logic functions, rather than as simple relays under CTH 8536 49 00. The exemption in Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. was unavailable because it was confined to relays with contact rating up to 7 amperes and the goods were not simpliciter relays. For the GE India matter, prior departmental awareness and an earlier classification decision on similar goods meant the extended limitation period was not satisfied, so the demand was time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>