<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1980 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773867</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging a show-cause notice issued under the Customs Act regarding alleged receipt of smuggled foreign gold. The petitioner claimed suppression of facts and violation of natural justice principles. The court found the SCN was issued after considering preliminary submissions and provided adequate hearing opportunity. The court held that when suppression of facts is alleged, admitted facts become questionable and new facts may emerge requiring reconsideration. Since alternative statutory remedies under Sections 128 and 129 of the Customs Act were available through appellate authorities, the court declined to interfere under Article 226.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:43:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1980 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773867</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging a show-cause notice issued under the Customs Act regarding alleged receipt of smuggled foreign gold. The petitioner claimed suppression of facts and violation of natural justice principles. The court found the SCN was issued after considering preliminary submissions and provided adequate hearing opportunity. The court held that when suppression of facts is alleged, admitted facts become questionable and new facts may emerge requiring reconsideration. Since alternative statutory remedies under Sections 128 and 129 of the Customs Act were available through appellate authorities, the court declined to interfere under Article 226.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>