<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1987 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773874</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi quashed reopening proceedings under Section 147 initiated after four years from the assessment year. The tribunal held that where an assessment under Section 153A has been completed and the four-year limitation period has expired, reopening can only occur if the assessee failed to disclose material facts fully and truly. Since the AO failed to record reasons establishing such non-disclosure in the case, the entire reopening proceeding was vitiated and quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:43:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1987 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773874</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi quashed reopening proceedings under Section 147 initiated after four years from the assessment year. The tribunal held that where an assessment under Section 153A has been completed and the four-year limitation period has expired, reopening can only occur if the assessee failed to disclose material facts fully and truly. Since the AO failed to record reasons establishing such non-disclosure in the case, the entire reopening proceeding was vitiated and quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>