<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1989 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773876</link>
    <description>A corporate guarantee to an associated enterprise is treated as an international transaction requiring arm&#039;s length benchmarking under the transfer pricing provisions. The transfer pricing adjustment on guarantee commission was upheld because the year-specific arm&#039;s length price had to be determined on the facts of the relevant year, and earlier year rates did not control the computation; bank guarantee rates were used as comparables with adjustments for risk and other differences. Interest on income-tax refund was held to be a statutory accretion arising from excess tax payment, lacking proximate nexus with business operations, and was therefore assessable as income from other sources rather than business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:43:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1989 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773876</link>
      <description>A corporate guarantee to an associated enterprise is treated as an international transaction requiring arm&#039;s length benchmarking under the transfer pricing provisions. The transfer pricing adjustment on guarantee commission was upheld because the year-specific arm&#039;s length price had to be determined on the facts of the relevant year, and earlier year rates did not control the computation; bank guarantee rates were used as comparables with adjustments for risk and other differences. Interest on income-tax refund was held to be a statutory accretion arising from excess tax payment, lacking proximate nexus with business operations, and was therefore assessable as income from other sources rather than business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>