<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 2015 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773902</link>
    <description>Telangana HC rejected petitioner&#039;s challenge to income tax assessment reopening despite completion of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and NCLT-approved resolution plan. Court found authorities had valid reasons to investigate suspected fraudulent transactions involving identical purchase-sale quantities, momentary time gaps between trades, and significant price variations across eight contracts, indicating potential tax evasion of Rs.3 crores. While recovery proceedings post-resolution plan approval are impermissible, reassessment for scrutinizing illegal transactions and pursuing action against responsible directors remains legally permissible. Court emphasized CIRP cannot shield deliberate tax evasion or fraudulent activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:43:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 2015 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773902</link>
      <description>Telangana HC rejected petitioner&#039;s challenge to income tax assessment reopening despite completion of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and NCLT-approved resolution plan. Court found authorities had valid reasons to investigate suspected fraudulent transactions involving identical purchase-sale quantities, momentary time gaps between trades, and significant price variations across eight contracts, indicating potential tax evasion of Rs.3 crores. While recovery proceedings post-resolution plan approval are impermissible, reassessment for scrutinizing illegal transactions and pursuing action against responsible directors remains legally permissible. Court emphasized CIRP cannot shield deliberate tax evasion or fraudulent activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>