<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 2022 - PATIALA HOUSE COURTS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773909</link>
    <description>The HC granted bail to the accused in a CGST case involving creation of multiple fake firms for illegal input credit advantage. Despite the department&#039;s arguments about flight risk and investigation hampering, the court found no substance in these claims as no summons were issued post-protection withdrawal and accused had no prior criminal record. The accused was in custody for 57 days without complaint filing within the prescribed 60-day period. Citing SC precedent in Vineet Jain case, the court noted evidence was primarily documentary and investigation appeared complete. Bail was granted with conditions including Rs. 2,00,000 bond and family member surety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:43:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 2022 - PATIALA HOUSE COURTS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773909</link>
      <description>The HC granted bail to the accused in a CGST case involving creation of multiple fake firms for illegal input credit advantage. Despite the department&#039;s arguments about flight risk and investigation hampering, the court found no substance in these claims as no summons were issued post-protection withdrawal and accused had no prior criminal record. The accused was in custody for 57 days without complaint filing within the prescribed 60-day period. Citing SC precedent in Vineet Jain case, the court noted evidence was primarily documentary and investigation appeared complete. Bail was granted with conditions including Rs. 2,00,000 bond and family member surety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>