<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 2028 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773915</link>
    <description>Fixing the same date for filing a reply and for personal hearing in GST penalty proceedings can amount to denial of a reasonable opportunity to be heard and a breach of natural justice. Where the notice does not give the assessee a meaningful chance to respond before the matter is decided, the resulting penalty order and any appellate order are liable to be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after proper hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:43:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 2028 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773915</link>
      <description>Fixing the same date for filing a reply and for personal hearing in GST penalty proceedings can amount to denial of a reasonable opportunity to be heard and a breach of natural justice. Where the notice does not give the assessee a meaningful chance to respond before the matter is decided, the resulting penalty order and any appellate order are liable to be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after proper hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>