<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 113 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44721</link>
    <description>Plastic scrap or crush, for the pre-1982 period, was treated as falling under the residuary Entry 68 of the Central Excise tariff and not under Item 15A(i) or 15A(ii). The Tribunal&#039;s classification view was consistent with earlier decisions on the same question, and the appeals raised no different classification issue. Accordingly, the goods remained outside Item 15A(i) and 15A(ii) for that period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:53:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 113 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44721</link>
      <description>Plastic scrap or crush, for the pre-1982 period, was treated as falling under the residuary Entry 68 of the Central Excise tariff and not under Item 15A(i) or 15A(ii). The Tribunal&#039;s classification view was consistent with earlier decisions on the same question, and the appeals raised no different classification issue. Accordingly, the goods remained outside Item 15A(i) and 15A(ii) for that period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>