https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44714 The HC held that the Tribunal had not properly exercised its discretion in insisting on a pre-deposit under the proviso to Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The dispute was found to be arguable, and the closure of the factory, which was not controverted, supported waiver of the deposit condition. On that basis, the Court dispensed with the pre-deposit requirement and set aside the Tribunal's interim order. en-us Fri, 25 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:36:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44714 The HC held that the Tribunal had not properly exercised its discretion in insisting on a pre-deposit under the proviso to Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The dispute was found to be arguable, and the closure of the factory, which was not controverted, supported waiver of the deposit condition. On that basis, the Court dispensed with the pre-deposit requirement and set aside the Tribunal's interim order. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44714