<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 84 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44709</link>
    <description>The fresh adjudication made by the Assistant Collector pursuant to an earlier remand direction was appealable to the Collector (Appeals), because it determined the short-levy demand under Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The Collector (Appeals) erred in declining jurisdiction and directing the appellant to approach the Tribunal, and that mistaken forum direction could not sustain the Tribunal&#039;s dismissal on limitation or the High Court&#039;s affirmance. The orders of the Collector (Appeals), the Tribunal and the High Court were set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Collector (Appeals) for disposal of the appeal on merits in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:27:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 84 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44709</link>
      <description>The fresh adjudication made by the Assistant Collector pursuant to an earlier remand direction was appealable to the Collector (Appeals), because it determined the short-levy demand under Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The Collector (Appeals) erred in declining jurisdiction and directing the appellant to approach the Tribunal, and that mistaken forum direction could not sustain the Tribunal&#039;s dismissal on limitation or the High Court&#039;s affirmance. The orders of the Collector (Appeals), the Tribunal and the High Court were set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Collector (Appeals) for disposal of the appeal on merits in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>