<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>TPO correctly recharacterized engineering design services as KPO not BPO, ITAT partially allows comparable selection challenges</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89899</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld TPO&#039;s recharacterization of Appellant&#039;s engineering design services as Knowledge Process Outsourcing (KPO) rather than Business Process Outsourcing (BPO), finding the services involved highly technical work including 3D modelling, technical specifications, and structural analysis requiring specialized technical staff. Regarding comparable selection, ITAT upheld inclusion of Mahindra Consulting Engineers Ltd despite Appellant&#039;s RPT filter objections, but directed exclusion of Genesys International Corporation Ltd and L&amp;T Technologies Services Ltd as functionally dissimilar. ITAT confirmed consultancy charges as operating costs but directed exclusion of goodwill amortization from operating expenses. Capacity utilization adjustment.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 08:32:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 08:32:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>TPO correctly recharacterized engineering design services as KPO not BPO, ITAT partially allows comparable selection challenges</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89899</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld TPO&#039;s recharacterization of Appellant&#039;s engineering design services as Knowledge Process Outsourcing (KPO) rather than Business Process Outsourcing (BPO), finding the services involved highly technical work including 3D modelling, technical specifications, and structural analysis requiring specialized technical staff. Regarding comparable selection, ITAT upheld inclusion of Mahindra Consulting Engineers Ltd despite Appellant&#039;s RPT filter objections, but directed exclusion of Genesys International Corporation Ltd and L&amp;T Technologies Services Ltd as functionally dissimilar. ITAT confirmed consultancy charges as operating costs but directed exclusion of goodwill amortization from operating expenses. Capacity utilization adjustment.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 08:32:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>