<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Clandestine removal demands set aside due to lack of independent corroboration beyond self-incriminating statements</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89883</link>
    <description>CESTAT partially allowed the appeal involving clandestine removal allegations of craft paper and packing material. The tribunal set aside demands totaling Rs. 23,03,781 for alleged clandestine clearance of kraft paper and Rs. 74,827 for packing material, finding insufficient independent corroboration despite documents recovered during searches. The department&#039;s case relied solely on self-incriminating statements without verifying evidence through simultaneous searches of suppliers and customers. Regarding CENVAT credit denial for GTA services worth Rs. 3,19,176, the matter was remanded for redetermination under normal limitation period following CBIC Circular 1065/4/2018. The undervaluation demand of Rs. 10,71,211 under Rule 7 was remanded .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 08:32:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 08:32:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Clandestine removal demands set aside due to lack of independent corroboration beyond self-incriminating statements</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89883</link>
      <description>CESTAT partially allowed the appeal involving clandestine removal allegations of craft paper and packing material. The tribunal set aside demands totaling Rs. 23,03,781 for alleged clandestine clearance of kraft paper and Rs. 74,827 for packing material, finding insufficient independent corroboration despite documents recovered during searches. The department&#039;s case relied solely on self-incriminating statements without verifying evidence through simultaneous searches of suppliers and customers. Regarding CENVAT credit denial for GTA services worth Rs. 3,19,176, the matter was remanded for redetermination under normal limitation period following CBIC Circular 1065/4/2018. The undervaluation demand of Rs. 10,71,211 under Rule 7 was remanded .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 08:32:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>