https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773759 Calcutta HC dismissed an appeal in a cheque dishonour case under NI Act. The accused, working as project manager, issued a cheque for legally enforceable debt which was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The accused admitted receiving payment from company, taking advances, and his signature on the cheque. He failed to rebut the presumption under section 139 NI Act with cogent evidence. The demand notice was properly served within statutory period. HC affirmed both trial court and lower appellate court judgments, directing the convict to appear within thirty days to serve sentence of TRC and compensation payment. en-us Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Jun 2025 08:31:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773759 Calcutta HC dismissed an appeal in a cheque dishonour case under NI Act. The accused, working as project manager, issued a cheque for legally enforceable debt which was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The accused admitted receiving payment from company, taking advances, and his signature on the cheque. He failed to rebut the presumption under section 139 NI Act with cogent evidence. The demand notice was properly served within statutory period. HC affirmed both trial court and lower appellate court judgments, directing the convict to appear within thirty days to serve sentence of TRC and compensation payment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773759