<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1878 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773765</link>
    <description>Supply of machinery on hire, where effective possession and control passed to the and VAT was paid, amounted to a transfer of the right to use goods and therefore a deemed sale under Article 366(29A). The activity fell within the VAT domain, so service tax could not be levied again on the same transaction. As the underlying tax demand was unsustainable, the consequential interest and penalties also failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 08:31:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1878 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773765</link>
      <description>Supply of machinery on hire, where effective possession and control passed to the and VAT was paid, amounted to a transfer of the right to use goods and therefore a deemed sale under Article 366(29A). The activity fell within the VAT domain, so service tax could not be levied again on the same transaction. As the underlying tax demand was unsustainable, the consequential interest and penalties also failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>