<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1882 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773769</link>
    <description>Curable defects in a complaint filed within time do not, by themselves, create a right to default bail where the investigation is already complete and the complaint is later re-presented after correction. Under the money-laundering bail regime, release on merits depends on the statutory twin conditions: the court must have reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit an offence while on bail. The court accepted that section 50 statements may have evidentiary significance, but held that the prosecution material, including financial evidence, did not permit satisfaction of those conditions. Bail was therefore declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 08:31:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1882 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773769</link>
      <description>Curable defects in a complaint filed within time do not, by themselves, create a right to default bail where the investigation is already complete and the complaint is later re-presented after correction. Under the money-laundering bail regime, release on merits depends on the statutory twin conditions: the court must have reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit an offence while on bail. The court accepted that section 50 statements may have evidentiary significance, but held that the prosecution material, including financial evidence, did not permit satisfaction of those conditions. Bail was therefore declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>