<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1895 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773782</link>
    <description>Prima facie evidence from WhatsApp screenshots taken from one appellant&#039;s device, cash transfers between him and Ketan Parekh, and a trade pattern suggesting instructions based on prior knowledge of a big client&#039;s impending orders justified refusing dilution of the deposit condition to 50% of the estimated wrongful gain. On the facts before the Tribunal, the request for interim relief was unsupported, and the interim prayer was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 08:31:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1895 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773782</link>
      <description>Prima facie evidence from WhatsApp screenshots taken from one appellant&#039;s device, cash transfers between him and Ketan Parekh, and a trade pattern suggesting instructions based on prior knowledge of a big client&#039;s impending orders justified refusing dilution of the deposit condition to 50% of the estimated wrongful gain. On the facts before the Tribunal, the request for interim relief was unsupported, and the interim prayer was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>