<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1935 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773822</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding transfer pricing comparable selection. The Tribunal excluded four companies - Cybage Software Pvt. Ltd., Nihilent Ltd., Infobeans Technologies Ltd., and E-Infochips Pvt. Ltd. - from the comparables list, consistent with previous decisions for assessment years 2014-15, 2016-17, and 2017-18. Additionally, Ninestars Information Technologies Ltd. was excluded following the precedent in Persistent Systems Ltd. case, where similar software development activities were deemed incomparable. The Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer was directed to exclude all five companies from determining arm&#039;s length price for international transactions with associated enterprises.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2025 08:31:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1935 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773822</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding transfer pricing comparable selection. The Tribunal excluded four companies - Cybage Software Pvt. Ltd., Nihilent Ltd., Infobeans Technologies Ltd., and E-Infochips Pvt. Ltd. - from the comparables list, consistent with previous decisions for assessment years 2014-15, 2016-17, and 2017-18. Additionally, Ninestars Information Technologies Ltd. was excluded following the precedent in Persistent Systems Ltd. case, where similar software development activities were deemed incomparable. The Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer was directed to exclude all five companies from determining arm&#039;s length price for international transactions with associated enterprises.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>