https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89870 ITAT deleted penalty under section 271(1)(c) imposed on transfer pricing adjustments involving manufacturing and trading segments. TPO made adjustments by using PBIT/Sales instead of assessee's PBDIT/Sales as Profit Level Indicator, modifying filters and comparables for benchmarking, and excluding certain operating items. Revenue authorities levied penalty solely because TPO's adjustments were upheld by CIT(A) and partly confirmed by ITAT. ITAT held that assessee furnished accurate details in return and transfer pricing study report using prescribed TNMM method under section 92C. Adjustments arose from interpretational differences on debatable issues, not inaccurate particulars. Neither TPO nor CIT(A) found arm's length price computed witho..... en-us Fri, 27 Jun 2025 18:28:24 +0530 Fri, 27 Jun 2025 18:28:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89870 ITAT deleted penalty under section 271(1)(c) imposed on transfer pricing adjustments involving manufacturing and trading segments. TPO made adjustments by using PBIT/Sales instead of assessee's PBDIT/Sales as Profit Level Indicator, modifying filters and comparables for benchmarking, and excluding certain operating items. Revenue authorities levied penalty solely because TPO's adjustments were upheld by CIT(A) and partly confirmed by ITAT. ITAT held that assessee furnished accurate details in return and transfer pricing study report using prescribed TNMM method under section 92C. Adjustments arose from interpretational differences on debatable issues, not inaccurate particulars. Neither TPO nor CIT(A) found arm's length price computed witho..... Highlights Income Tax Fri, 27 Jun 2025 18:28:24 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89870