https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44684 Coercive recovery of excise duty and penalty was held unjustified while statutory appeals and accompanying stay applications remained pending before the appellate authority. The text states that, where an assessee has already challenged the adjudication order and sought stay, recovery should not be pursued during the period in which the stay request is yet to be decided. The operative effect is that recovery action must remain in abeyance until the appellate authority considers the stay application, preserving the effectiveness of the pending appellate remedy. en-us Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jul 2010 11:53:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44684 Coercive recovery of excise duty and penalty was held unjustified while statutory appeals and accompanying stay applications remained pending before the appellate authority. The text states that, where an assessee has already challenged the adjudication order and sought stay, recovery should not be pursued during the period in which the stay request is yet to be decided. The operative effect is that recovery action must remain in abeyance until the appellate authority considers the stay application, preserving the effectiveness of the pending appellate remedy. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44684