<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1849 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773736</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand in a Cenvat Credit dispute involving various services including construction, rent-a-cab, gardening, canteen, golf club membership, and catering services for 2010-2013. The original adjudicating authority had disallowed credit due to lack of documentary evidence and questioned whether services qualified as &quot;input services&quot; under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The tribunal set aside the demand for disallowed credit, interest, and penalty, noting appellant&#039;s subsequent production of documents and citing HC precedent allowing credit for certain services before April 2011. Matter remanded for fresh adjudication within ninety days with directions to follow natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 08:37:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1849 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773736</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand in a Cenvat Credit dispute involving various services including construction, rent-a-cab, gardening, canteen, golf club membership, and catering services for 2010-2013. The original adjudicating authority had disallowed credit due to lack of documentary evidence and questioned whether services qualified as &quot;input services&quot; under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The tribunal set aside the demand for disallowed credit, interest, and penalty, noting appellant&#039;s subsequent production of documents and citing HC precedent allowing credit for certain services before April 2011. Matter remanded for fresh adjudication within ninety days with directions to follow natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>