<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1857 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773744</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai deleted addition under section 69A for undisclosed income relating to unexplained cash deposits. The assessee had already offered Rs. 30,00,000 to tax in the return and maintained adequate cash balance in cash book to support bank deposits. Revenue raised no specific objection to assessee&#039;s factual submissions. CIT(A)&#039;s sustained addition was deleted and assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed. Revenue did not appeal against portion already deleted by CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 08:37:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1857 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773744</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai deleted addition under section 69A for undisclosed income relating to unexplained cash deposits. The assessee had already offered Rs. 30,00,000 to tax in the return and maintained adequate cash balance in cash book to support bank deposits. Revenue raised no specific objection to assessee&#039;s factual submissions. CIT(A)&#039;s sustained addition was deleted and assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed. Revenue did not appeal against portion already deleted by CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>