<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1568 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462502</link>
    <description>SC conditionally admitted the appeal after condoning delay in filing. The matter was ordered to be listed together with Civil Appeal No. 4966/2014 for consolidated hearing. The bench comprising two justices allowed the delayed appeal to proceed, indicating procedural requirements were satisfied despite the late filing. The case will be heard alongside the related civil appeal for judicial efficiency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 08:36:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1568 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462502</link>
      <description>SC conditionally admitted the appeal after condoning delay in filing. The matter was ordered to be listed together with Civil Appeal No. 4966/2014 for consolidated hearing. The bench comprising two justices allowed the delayed appeal to proceed, indicating procedural requirements were satisfied despite the late filing. The case will be heard alongside the related civil appeal for judicial efficiency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>