https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773689 The HC dismissed the petition challenging an order withdrawing the petitioner's additional charge of MPB Kandwal while retaining his primary posting at Nurpur Circle. The Court held that the impugned order did not constitute a transfer violating the Government Transfer Policy, as the petitioner remained at his original station and was merely relieved of additional duties. The Court noted the distance between locations was less than 12 kilometers, the petitioner had served over eight months at MPB Kandwal, and his primary posting remained unchanged. The petition was found to misrepresent facts by portraying the administrative order as an improper transfer when it was actually a withdrawal of additional charge. en-us Fri, 20 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jun 2025 08:36:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773689 The HC dismissed the petition challenging an order withdrawing the petitioner's additional charge of MPB Kandwal while retaining his primary posting at Nurpur Circle. The Court held that the impugned order did not constitute a transfer violating the Government Transfer Policy, as the petitioner remained at his original station and was merely relieved of additional duties. The Court noted the distance between locations was less than 12 kilometers, the petitioner had served over eight months at MPB Kandwal, and his primary posting remained unchanged. The petition was found to misrepresent facts by portraying the administrative order as an improper transfer when it was actually a withdrawal of additional charge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773689