<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1822 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773709</link>
    <description>NCLAT Chennai allowed Resolution Professional&#039;s application to issue fresh Form G inviting new Expression of Interest from prospective resolution applicants. The tribunal found no legal embargo under I&amp;amp;B Code 2016 preventing fresh EoI after completion of resolution plan submissions and voting. NCLAT held that inviting new applicants would increase competition, result in higher bids, and maximize value - the basic objective of the Code. The order was deemed fair and transparent as it reopened EoI for all parties, not selectively. NCLAT quashed the lower tribunal&#039;s contrary order, directing completion of CIRP within statutory timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 08:36:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1822 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773709</link>
      <description>NCLAT Chennai allowed Resolution Professional&#039;s application to issue fresh Form G inviting new Expression of Interest from prospective resolution applicants. The tribunal found no legal embargo under I&amp;amp;B Code 2016 preventing fresh EoI after completion of resolution plan submissions and voting. NCLAT held that inviting new applicants would increase competition, result in higher bids, and maximize value - the basic objective of the Code. The order was deemed fair and transparent as it reopened EoI for all parties, not selectively. NCLAT quashed the lower tribunal&#039;s contrary order, directing completion of CIRP within statutory timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>