https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773710 NCLAT Chennai dismissed an appeal challenging rejection of Section 9 application under I&B Code. The appellant concealed material facts including that demand was based on MSEFC award, writ petition challenging the award was pending before Kerala HC, and corporate debtor had denied liability citing pre-existing dispute. NCLAT held parties must approach courts with clean hands and material concealment of vital facts disentitles relief. The tribunal correctly rejected the application as it was based on false averments and concealment of facts bearing on adjudication merits. en-us Fri, 20 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jun 2025 08:36:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773710 NCLAT Chennai dismissed an appeal challenging rejection of Section 9 application under I&B Code. The appellant concealed material facts including that demand was based on MSEFC award, writ petition challenging the award was pending before Kerala HC, and corporate debtor had denied liability citing pre-existing dispute. NCLAT held parties must approach courts with clean hands and material concealment of vital facts disentitles relief. The tribunal correctly rejected the application as it was based on false averments and concealment of facts bearing on adjudication merits. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 20 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773710