https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773711 Delay of 374 days in filing a restoration application was condoned because the applicants showed sufficient cause through medical uments, and the explanation was not seriously disputed. The contempt petition, dismissed for default, was restored because contempt proceedings are meant to secure compliance with an earlier order and should not be terminated on technical non-prosecution where registry defects had not been fully cured. The impugned orders were set aside, and the contempt matter was revived for consideration on merits. en-us Fri, 20 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jun 2025 08:36:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773711 Delay of 374 days in filing a restoration application was condoned because the applicants showed sufficient cause through medical uments, and the explanation was not seriously disputed. The contempt petition, dismissed for default, was restored because contempt proceedings are meant to secure compliance with an earlier order and should not be terminated on technical non-prosecution where registry defects had not been fully cured. The impugned orders were set aside, and the contempt matter was revived for consideration on merits. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 20 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773711