<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1826 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773713</link>
    <description>Custodial interrogation was found unnecessary where the allegations concerned transfer of shares and the investigation turned mainly on documentary records such as board resolutions, shareholder registers, transfer entries and Form SH-4. The applicants had joined investigation, supplied documents in their possession, and the relevant company and statutory records were already available with the agency. Delay in lodging the FIR, the family and matrimonial setting, lack of criminal antecedents, and no material of tampering or witness intimidation also supported protection. On that basis, anticipatory bail was considered warranted, subject to conditions securing cooperation and availability before the investigating agency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 08:36:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1826 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773713</link>
      <description>Custodial interrogation was found unnecessary where the allegations concerned transfer of shares and the investigation turned mainly on documentary records such as board resolutions, shareholder registers, transfer entries and Form SH-4. The applicants had joined investigation, supplied documents in their possession, and the relevant company and statutory records were already available with the agency. Delay in lodging the FIR, the family and matrimonial setting, lack of criminal antecedents, and no material of tampering or witness intimidation also supported protection. On that basis, anticipatory bail was considered warranted, subject to conditions securing cooperation and availability before the investigating agency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>