<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 76 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44659</link>
    <description>The appeals under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act were dismissed by the High Court as they were deemed not maintainable. The Court held that the question of valuation for a refund did not relate to the value of goods for assessment purposes. The appellant was granted two weeks to file an application for reference under Section 35G, with the Tribunal willing to address it on its merits if submitted within the specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 10:00:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 76 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44659</link>
      <description>The appeals under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act were dismissed by the High Court as they were deemed not maintainable. The Court held that the question of valuation for a refund did not relate to the value of goods for assessment purposes. The appellant was granted two weeks to file an application for reference under Section 35G, with the Tribunal willing to address it on its merits if submitted within the specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>