<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>VIOLATION OF RULE 86B LIABLE FOR GENERAL PENALTY OR FURTHER PAY TAX BY CASH?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120181</link>
    <description>Misuse of input tax credit by utilising 100% instead of the permitted proportion under Rule 86B can lead the department to demand the remaining cash deposit along with interest and penalty; excess tax paid through ITC may be adjusted in subsequent periods, though one authority has observed the demand to be ultra vires without a final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:16:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2025 06:34:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>VIOLATION OF RULE 86B LIABLE FOR GENERAL PENALTY OR FURTHER PAY TAX BY CASH?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120181</link>
      <description>Misuse of input tax credit by utilising 100% instead of the permitted proportion under Rule 86B can lead the department to demand the remaining cash deposit along with interest and penalty; excess tax paid through ITC may be adjusted in subsequent periods, though one authority has observed the demand to be ultra vires without a final decision.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:16:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>