<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 102 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44651</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision on including service charges in the assessable value for excise duty. The matter was remitted to the Assistant Collector for verification of actual rental and service charges to determine the correct assessable value. The appellant was directed to provide necessary material for this verification. No costs were awarded in this judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 102 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44651</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision on including service charges in the assessable value for excise duty. The matter was remitted to the Assistant Collector for verification of actual rental and service charges to determine the correct assessable value. The appellant was directed to provide necessary material for this verification. No costs were awarded in this judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>