<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT quashes revision order under section 263, upholds cooperative society&#039;s section 80P deduction for interest income</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89806</link>
    <description>ITAT set aside PCIT&#039;s revision order under section 263 regarding cooperative society&#039;s deduction claim under section 80P(2)(a) and 80P(2)(d) for interest income. The Tribunal held that while AO&#039;s order allowing deduction may be prejudicial to revenue interest, it was not erroneous since AO conducted proper inquiry and took plausible view after examining assessee&#039;s responses. Following coordinate bench precedent in Talegaon Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Limited, interest income from deposits with banks qualified for deduction. ITAT emphasized twin conditions for section 263 jurisdiction - order must be both erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. Since AO&#039;s decision was reasoned and based on adequate examination, PCIT lacked jurisdiction to revise. Appeal allowed, revision order quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 08:35:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 08:35:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT quashes revision order under section 263, upholds cooperative society&#039;s section 80P deduction for interest income</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89806</link>
      <description>ITAT set aside PCIT&#039;s revision order under section 263 regarding cooperative society&#039;s deduction claim under section 80P(2)(a) and 80P(2)(d) for interest income. The Tribunal held that while AO&#039;s order allowing deduction may be prejudicial to revenue interest, it was not erroneous since AO conducted proper inquiry and took plausible view after examining assessee&#039;s responses. Following coordinate bench precedent in Talegaon Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Limited, interest income from deposits with banks qualified for deduction. ITAT emphasized twin conditions for section 263 jurisdiction - order must be both erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. Since AO&#039;s decision was reasoned and based on adequate examination, PCIT lacked jurisdiction to revise. Appeal allowed, revision order quashed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 08:35:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>