<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1732 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773619</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the service tax demand on delayed payment charges (DPC) collected by a stock broker company from clients. The Tribunal held that DPC constitutes penal interest for delayed payments rather than consideration for a declared service under Section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994. Following precedents including South Eastern Coalfields Ltd., the Tribunal ruled that penal charges designed to safeguard commercial interests and discourage defaults do not amount to &quot;tolerating an act&quot; under the declared services provision. The charges were found to be compensatory in nature, not fees for providing a separate service of toleration, making them exempt from service tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 16:44:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1732 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773619</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the service tax demand on delayed payment charges (DPC) collected by a stock broker company from clients. The Tribunal held that DPC constitutes penal interest for delayed payments rather than consideration for a declared service under Section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994. Following precedents including South Eastern Coalfields Ltd., the Tribunal ruled that penal charges designed to safeguard commercial interests and discourage defaults do not amount to &quot;tolerating an act&quot; under the declared services provision. The charges were found to be compensatory in nature, not fees for providing a separate service of toleration, making them exempt from service tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>