<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1746 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773633</link>
    <description>ITAT Visakhapatnam quashed assessment orders under section 153C for assessment years 2016-17 and 2017-18, finding no valid satisfaction recorded by the AO of the searched person. The satisfaction dated 03.09.2018 regarding the assessee was recorded before the searched person&#039;s satisfaction on 06.09.2018, creating jurisdictional invalidity. The tribunal held that without proper satisfaction from the searched person&#039;s AO, the entire proceedings lacked legal foundation. Additionally, regarding undisclosed business income from property sales, the tribunal directed estimation of 25% profit on total unaccounted receipts rather than treating entire gross receipts as unaccounted sales, recognizing legitimate business expenditure against on-money transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 08:35:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1746 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773633</link>
      <description>ITAT Visakhapatnam quashed assessment orders under section 153C for assessment years 2016-17 and 2017-18, finding no valid satisfaction recorded by the AO of the searched person. The satisfaction dated 03.09.2018 regarding the assessee was recorded before the searched person&#039;s satisfaction on 06.09.2018, creating jurisdictional invalidity. The tribunal held that without proper satisfaction from the searched person&#039;s AO, the entire proceedings lacked legal foundation. Additionally, regarding undisclosed business income from property sales, the tribunal directed estimation of 25% profit on total unaccounted receipts rather than treating entire gross receipts as unaccounted sales, recognizing legitimate business expenditure against on-money transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>