<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 137 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44641</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, directing the assessees to reply to show cause notices to enable authorities to determine facts. Emphasizing the need for factual findings on excise duty exigibility, the Court directed matters back to the Assistant Collector for decision. The assessees were given four weeks to respond, with the adjudicating authority instructed to decide based on law, allowing further legal remedies for aggrieved parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 137 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44641</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, directing the assessees to reply to show cause notices to enable authorities to determine facts. Emphasizing the need for factual findings on excise duty exigibility, the Court directed matters back to the Assistant Collector for decision. The assessees were given four weeks to respond, with the adjudicating authority instructed to decide based on law, allowing further legal remedies for aggrieved parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>