https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773645 ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee's appeal against addition under Section 69A for unexplained money. The tribunal found that the assessee provided adequate documentation including agricultural land ownership records, sale receipts, and cash withdrawal/deposit details with supporting bank statements and cash books. The AO and CIT(A) ignored these documents and wrongly concluded the agricultural income was bogus. The tribunal held that all supporting evidence should have been considered, making the addition unjustified and unsustainable. en-us Thu, 19 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Jun 2025 08:35:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773645 ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee's appeal against addition under Section 69A for unexplained money. The tribunal found that the assessee provided adequate documentation including agricultural land ownership records, sale receipts, and cash withdrawal/deposit details with supporting bank statements and cash books. The AO and CIT(A) ignored these documents and wrongly concluded the agricultural income was bogus. The tribunal held that all supporting evidence should have been considered, making the addition unjustified and unsustainable. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 19 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773645