<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1782 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773669</link>
    <description>A statutory appeal rejected solely for non-payment of the pre-deposit was found fit for remand where the equivalent amount was later paid through GST DRC-03. Because the pre-deposit had in substance been made and the tribunal was not yet constituted, the appellate order was set aside and the appeal was directed to be reconsidered on merits by the appellate authority within the time indicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 08:35:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1782 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773669</link>
      <description>A statutory appeal rejected solely for non-payment of the pre-deposit was found fit for remand where the equivalent amount was later paid through GST DRC-03. Because the pre-deposit had in substance been made and the tribunal was not yet constituted, the appellate order was set aside and the appeal was directed to be reconsidered on merits by the appellate authority within the time indicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>