https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773677 The Madras HC quashed orders passed by the Department reversing/negating petitioner's ITC claim. The court held that while the ITC claim was barred by limitation under Section 16(4) of CGST Act 2017, it fell within the prescribed period under Section 16(5) of the same Act. The Department was restrained from initiating proceedings against petitioners based on the limitation issue. The petition was allowed, following precedent from Sri Ganapathi Pandi Industries case. en-us Fri, 20 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Jun 2025 08:35:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773677 The Madras HC quashed orders passed by the Department reversing/negating petitioner's ITC claim. The court held that while the ITC claim was barred by limitation under Section 16(4) of CGST Act 2017, it fell within the prescribed period under Section 16(5) of the same Act. The Department was restrained from initiating proceedings against petitioners based on the limitation issue. The petition was allowed, following precedent from Sri Ganapathi Pandi Industries case. Case-Laws GST Fri, 20 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773677