https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773679 The SC set aside both the original bail order and modification order granted by the HC, finding that the voluntary monetary deposit of Rs. 2.50 crores offered by counsel improperly foreclosed judicial consideration of bail merits. The Court strongly deprecated the practice of using substantial monetary offers to bypass substantive scrutiny, holding that such conditions were onerous and undermined the judicial process. While condemning the petitioner's attempt to renege on counsel's undertaking after securing bail, the SC remitted the matter to HC for fresh merit-based consideration and granted interim protection from surrender pending rehearing. en-us Mon, 23 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jun 2025 16:39:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773679 The SC set aside both the original bail order and modification order granted by the HC, finding that the voluntary monetary deposit of Rs. 2.50 crores offered by counsel improperly foreclosed judicial consideration of bail merits. The Court strongly deprecated the practice of using substantial monetary offers to bypass substantive scrutiny, holding that such conditions were onerous and undermined the judicial process. While condemning the petitioner's attempt to renege on counsel's undertaking after securing bail, the SC remitted the matter to HC for fresh merit-based consideration and granted interim protection from surrender pending rehearing. Case-Laws GST Mon, 23 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773679