<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1507 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462484</link>
    <description>The ITAT Bangalore ruled on transfer pricing adjustments for an IT enabled services provider. The tribunal excluded three companies from comparable analysis: Harton Communications Ltd. due to lack of segmental revenue breakdown between software development and BPO services; Capgemini India Ltd. as it provides high-end specialized services unlike the assessee&#039;s low-end ITeS; and Infosys BPO Ltd. as it operates as a market leader with significant brand value, diverse service portfolio, and risk-bearing entrepreneur status unlike the captive service provider assessee. The tribunal also deleted additions related to common expense re-allocation, finding the AO&#039;s adjustment incorrect given the assessee&#039;s cost-plus markup model where charging expenses to STPI unit alone actually increased taxable income rather than reducing it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 19:01:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1507 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462484</link>
      <description>The ITAT Bangalore ruled on transfer pricing adjustments for an IT enabled services provider. The tribunal excluded three companies from comparable analysis: Harton Communications Ltd. due to lack of segmental revenue breakdown between software development and BPO services; Capgemini India Ltd. as it provides high-end specialized services unlike the assessee&#039;s low-end ITeS; and Infosys BPO Ltd. as it operates as a market leader with significant brand value, diverse service portfolio, and risk-bearing entrepreneur status unlike the captive service provider assessee. The tribunal also deleted additions related to common expense re-allocation, finding the AO&#039;s adjustment incorrect given the assessee&#039;s cost-plus markup model where charging expenses to STPI unit alone actually increased taxable income rather than reducing it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>