https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462489 A writ petition challenging a reopening notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequent assessment order was not entertained because an alternate appellate remedy was available. The petitioners were relegated to the appeal mechanism, with liberty to raise all contentions before the appellate authority. The decision reflects the principle that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked where an effective statutory remedy exists, unless exceptional grounds are shown. en-us Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jun 2025 19:01:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462489 A writ petition challenging a reopening notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequent assessment order was not entertained because an alternate appellate remedy was available. The petitioners were relegated to the appeal mechanism, with liberty to raise all contentions before the appellate authority. The decision reflects the principle that writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not invoked where an effective statutory remedy exists, unless exceptional grounds are shown. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462489