<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 95 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44624</link>
    <description>An assessee seeking dispensation of pre-deposit may legitimately expect the appellate authority to decide that application before coercive recovery is pursued, and recovery should not be enforced in the meantime. The High Court directed the appellate authority to dispose of the pending exemption and stay application within two months and restrained recovery of the disputed amount until that application is decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:18:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 95 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44624</link>
      <description>An assessee seeking dispensation of pre-deposit may legitimately expect the appellate authority to decide that application before coercive recovery is pursued, and recovery should not be enforced in the meantime. The High Court directed the appellate authority to dispose of the pending exemption and stay application within two months and restrained recovery of the disputed amount until that application is decided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>