https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462479 Writ jurisdiction was declined where the search and seizure were carried out by Income Tax authorities in Haryana, making maintainability before the Delhi High Court inappropriate on the facts stated. The Court accepted the preliminary objection to territorial maintainability, held that there was no justification to entertain or continue the petition before it, and left the parties free to approach the appropriate forum. The petition was therefore not entertained and was dismissed with liberty to seek relief before the proper High Court. en-us Fri, 09 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Apr 2026 11:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462479 Writ jurisdiction was declined where the search and seizure were carried out by Income Tax authorities in Haryana, making maintainability before the Delhi High Court inappropriate on the facts stated. The Court accepted the preliminary objection to territorial maintainability, held that there was no justification to entertain or continue the petition before it, and left the parties free to approach the appropriate forum. The petition was therefore not entertained and was dismissed with liberty to seek relief before the proper High Court. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 09 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462479