<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1668 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462470</link>
    <description>Reassessment based on the same material already examined in the original scrutiny assessment was treated as a change of opinion. The original assessment under section 143(3) had already considered the relevant issue, and the reopening under sections 147 and 148 relied on no fresh material outside the record. In these circumstances, the reassessment was held to be without legal basis, and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 11:04:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1668 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462470</link>
      <description>Reassessment based on the same material already examined in the original scrutiny assessment was treated as a change of opinion. The original assessment under section 143(3) had already considered the relevant issue, and the reopening under sections 147 and 148 relied on no fresh material outside the record. In these circumstances, the reassessment was held to be without legal basis, and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>