https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773555 A reward claim under a government scheme was considered payable where departmental communications and affidavits had already quantified the amount attributable to information supplied by the petitioner. The Court rejected the department's shifting objections based on alleged non-filing of Form-A and want of further sanction, finding the Form-A objection factually incorrect and belated. It held that once the reward was computed and approved at the departmental level, the respondents could not deny payment on vague grounds or delay the scheme's operation unfairly. The petitioner was entitled to the quantified reward already determined, with further reward to be assessed on the petitioner's materials. en-us Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:20:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773555 A reward claim under a government scheme was considered payable where departmental communications and affidavits had already quantified the amount attributable to information supplied by the petitioner. The Court rejected the department's shifting objections based on alleged non-filing of Form-A and want of further sanction, finding the Form-A objection factually incorrect and belated. It held that once the reward was computed and approved at the departmental level, the respondents could not deny payment on vague grounds or delay the scheme's operation unfairly. The petitioner was entitled to the quantified reward already determined, with further reward to be assessed on the petitioner's materials. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773555