<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1684 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773571</link>
    <description>Refund claims contrary to an assessment order were treated as not maintainable unless the assessment was first modified in appeal or review, following Priya Blue Industries. The CESTAT applied that principle to uphold rejection of the refund claim, and the civil appeal was disposed of by maintaining the CESTAT order while leaving the question of law open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 09:23:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1684 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773571</link>
      <description>Refund claims contrary to an assessment order were treated as not maintainable unless the assessment was first modified in appeal or review, following Priya Blue Industries. The CESTAT applied that principle to uphold rejection of the refund claim, and the civil appeal was disposed of by maintaining the CESTAT order while leaving the question of law open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>