<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1691 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773578</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned a 63-day delay in filing appeal due to assessee&#039;s wife&#039;s serious illness requiring hospitalization. The primary issue concerned cash deposits of Rs. 25,22,500 made during FY 2016-17 being wrongly added as unexplained cash credit under section 68 for AY 2015-16. The Tribunal held that additions must correspond to the correct assessment year and deleted the addition since deposits pertained to AY 2017-18, not 2015-16. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 09:23:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1691 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773578</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned a 63-day delay in filing appeal due to assessee&#039;s wife&#039;s serious illness requiring hospitalization. The primary issue concerned cash deposits of Rs. 25,22,500 made during FY 2016-17 being wrongly added as unexplained cash credit under section 68 for AY 2015-16. The Tribunal held that additions must correspond to the correct assessment year and deleted the addition since deposits pertained to AY 2017-18, not 2015-16. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>