<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1698 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773585</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s refusal to condone a 15-day delay in filing appeal, finding sufficient cause despite lack of medical certificate for counsel&#039;s illness. The Tribunal held the reassessment under sections 147/148/144/144B invalid due to procedural lapses including absence of proper sanction under section 151 and non-compliance with section 151A notifications. The AO&#039;s ex parte additions of cash deposits, interest income, and hotel bills totaling over Rs. 3.3 crores were set aside as the assessment failed to consider the assessee&#039;s exemption claim under section 10(23C)(iiiab) as an educational institution substantially financed by Government/UGC. The matter was remitted to AO for fresh assessment after due consideration of submissions and compliance with procedural requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 09:23:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1698 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773585</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s refusal to condone a 15-day delay in filing appeal, finding sufficient cause despite lack of medical certificate for counsel&#039;s illness. The Tribunal held the reassessment under sections 147/148/144/144B invalid due to procedural lapses including absence of proper sanction under section 151 and non-compliance with section 151A notifications. The AO&#039;s ex parte additions of cash deposits, interest income, and hotel bills totaling over Rs. 3.3 crores were set aside as the assessment failed to consider the assessee&#039;s exemption claim under section 10(23C)(iiiab) as an educational institution substantially financed by Government/UGC. The matter was remitted to AO for fresh assessment after due consideration of submissions and compliance with procedural requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>