<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1708 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773595</link>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside CIT(A)&#039;s ex-parte order. The AO arbitrarily estimated commission income at 12% net profit without basis, treating all bank deposits as business income against declared income of Rs. 1,25,950. CIT(A) failed to provide hearing opportunity to the assessee. Matter remanded to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication with proper hearing opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 09:23:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1708 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773595</link>
      <description>ITAT Hyderabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside CIT(A)&#039;s ex-parte order. The AO arbitrarily estimated commission income at 12% net profit without basis, treating all bank deposits as business income against declared income of Rs. 1,25,950. CIT(A) failed to provide hearing opportunity to the assessee. Matter remanded to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication with proper hearing opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>